Cargo Security

Following the tragic events of 9/11, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP), a part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that was formed in response to those events, together with other agencies in DHS, became responsible for ensuring that goods being imported into the U.S. had been secured from terrorist threats. A number of different legal requirements have been instituted, most recently the requirement that importers file an Importer Security Filing (ISF) with each entry of containerized cargo. The US has also worked with numerous port authorities around the world to enhance the security measures taken overseas before cargo whose final destination is the US is laden on a vessel. Air cargo is also subject to enhanced security requirements, including cargo handled by express couriers.

Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism


However, the program that has probably had the greatest impact on importers and foreign suppliers is the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT), which CBP first rolled out in 2002. While this, nominally, is still considered a "voluntary" program,  market conditions, such as the requirement that C-TPAT members only deal with business partners who are either C-TPAT members or can certify that they meet C-TPAT minimum security standards, suggests that it is, for practical purposes, a requirement for all importers. Security reviews have also been made a standard part of a Customs audit for those companies who are not members of C-TPAT. 

C-TPAT Application


 The procedure for joining the C-TPAT program, and the conditions for maintain membership in the program are found on the CBP website. Briefly, the applicant, which may be an importer, broker, other party in the supply chain such as a carrier or consolidator, as well as certain foreign suppliers, must respond to the questions on the CBP website which address the security profile of the applicant. A Supply Chain Security Specialist (SCSS) will review the responses and if all are acceptable, will inform the applicant that they have been accepted as a member of the program. In the case of an importer the application will ask questions about the security measures that are in place at all of the locations which handle cargo destined to the U.S. such as factories, consolidators, warehouses, etc. They questions are quite specific, such as what type of physical security is present at the plant, is there a perimeter fence, what type of access controls are in place for visitors and employees, how is inventory guarded, what procedure is followed to load and seal containers, what type of security training and awareness programs are in place, what type of IT security is in place and similar questions that are all designed to allow CBP to acertain whether the facilities met so-called “minimum security requirements.” After an importer is accepted into the program, CBP will schedule a validation, i.e.., a visit to a foreign facility. If the security procedures at the facility are found to be acceptable the importer will become a certified member and be giving a rating of Tier II (meets minimum security standards) or Tier III (exceeds minimum security standards), or will fail the validation and be given an opportunity to address the changes that have been identified or be suspended from the program. Every member has to be re-validated every three of four years, depending on their status in the program.

BRC has assisted many importers in helping them prepare for the application process, assisting in filing the application and preparing companies for a successful validation. Several clients that we have helped have attained Tier III status, a ranking that is achieved by only a few hundred of the ten thousand companies who have joined so far. We have provided guidance on how to evaluate several hundred supply chains that individual companies may have and have provided clients with all the necessary tools needed to remain member in good standing in the program.  

 

 

Aug. 6, 2025
Additional 25% Tariffs on Indian Imports Announced
Aug. 1, 2025
New Round of Global Tariffs: A Round Up
Jul. 31, 2025
Copper 232 Coverage Issued Through Customs
Jul. 30, 2025
Gird Your Wires: Copper Tariffs Coming August 1st
Jul. 30, 2025
Brazil Gets Its Own IEEPA Tariffs
Jul. 30, 2025
De Minimis Window to Close August 29
Jul. 29, 2025
Boston Train Cars Detained by Customs for Forced Labor Allegations
Jul. 28, 2025
Trump Announces Trade Agreement Framework with the EU
Jul. 23, 2025
Trump Announces Trade Deals with Philippines, Indonesia, and Japan
Jul. 16, 2025
USTR Initiates Section 301 Investigation on Brazil
Jul. 15, 2025
Commerce Initiates Section 232 Investigations into Drones and Polysilicon Imports
Jul. 8, 2025
President Trump Spills the Tea on Copper Tariffs
Jul. 2, 2025
Trump Announces Trade Deal With Vietnam
Jul. 1, 2025
Canada Changes Course on Digital Services Tax
Jun. 17, 2025
Trump Administration and UK Sign Trade Deal
Jun. 16, 2025
Customs' Guidance on Aluminum Imports: Know the Country of Smelt and Cast or Pay 200%
Jun. 12, 2025
U.S. and China in a Trade Deal with Details to Follow
Jun. 9, 2025
Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Tariffs Rise, Change, and Maybe Expand
Jun.3, 2025
Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Tariffs on the Rise
Jun. 2, 2025
CIT Clarifies Scope Referral Requirement in EAPA Cases
May 30, 2025
Tariffs Back on For a While Probably, Maybe
May 22, 2025
Skirting the Law: UFLPA Compliance and Subsidiaries
May 15, 2025
Another Customs "Clarification" Excludes Feeder Ships from In-Transit Vessel Exemption
May 13, 2025
White House Announces Trade Deal With China (UPDATE)
May 12, 2025
Commerce Initiates Section 232 Investigation on Aircraft, Engines, and Parts
May 12, 2025
White House Announces Trade Deal With China
May 12, 2025
Customs Clarifies "U.S. Content" for Reciprocal Duties
Ma 8, 2025
U.S. and U.K. Strike Trade Deal Following Trump Tariffs
May 7, 2025
CIT Issues Classification Neither Party Advocated
May 1, 2025
A Brief Survey of the IEEPA Legal Challenges
Apr. 30, 2025
CBP Clarifies: In-Transit Tariff Exemption Applies Only to Vessel Shipments
Apr. 29, 2025
Administration to Ease Auto and Parts Tariffs
Apr. 29, 2025
Latest Executive Order Limits Tariff Stacking
Apr. 24, 2025
De Minimis Ending for Goods of China (and Hong Kong)
Apr. 23, 2025
Section 232 Takes on Medium and Heavy-Duty Trucks
Apr. 17, 2025
Another Rapid Response Mechanism Request on the Books
Apr. 16, 2025
Trump Orders National Security Investigation for Critical Minerals
Apr. 10, 2025
EU to Pause Countermeasure Response for 90 Days
Apr. 9, 2025
EU and China Strike Back with Tariffs on U.S. Imports
Apr. 9, 2025
Trump Announces 90-Day Pause on Country-Specific Reciprocal Tariffs
Apr. 8, 2025
Customs Issues "Reciprocal Tariffs" Guidance
Apr. 8, 2025
White House Indicates China Will Face (at least) 104% Duties
Apr. 4, 2025
Tariff Subheading Guidance for ‘Reciprocal Tariffs' Published
Apr. 4, 2025
Global Response to U.S. ‘Reciprocal Tariffs'
Apr. 3, 2025
Correction and Exclusions for ‘Reciprocal Tariffs' Published
Apr. 2, 2025
Trump Announces 25% Tariff on Passenger Vehicles, Light Trucks, and Auto Parts
Apr. 2, 2025
Changes to De Minimis Duty Free Treatment for Good from China and Hong Kong