Intellectual Property

Customs and Border Protection is responsible for preventing merchandise that infringes U.S. copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights from entering the country. Customs is also responsible for the enforcement of exclusion ordered issued by the International Trade Commission in Section 337 cases, which generally focus on the enforcement of patent rights.

Trademark Issues

Importers of branded merchandise should be aware that the law prohibits the importation of merchandise bearing a U.S. trademark without the permission of the trademark owner. Thus, importers should be prepared to show authorization from the rights holder. Absent permission, Customs can seize the infringing goods. While Customs can seize any infringing goods, its primary focus is on the interdiction of counterfeit goods. Counterfeit goods are products that bear a mark that copies or simulates a registered trademark. Because counterfeiting is illegal activity, the counterfeited products are often of inferior quality and may pose a risk to health and safety.

Copyrights

Customs also has the power to exclude "piratical" copies of products covered by copyright such as books, music, videos, software, and video games. A piratical copy is one that is produced without the authorization of the copyright holder. Because products imported into the U.S. often include a copyrightable elements (e.g., written instructions, packaging artwork, etc.), copyrights may be a viable alternative to trademark enforcement for companies seeking to prevent the entry of "knock-off products."

Gray Market Goods

It is often possible to find desirable products on sale outside the United States at discounted prices. This creates the possibility that goods will be imported through unauthorized channels. Such goods are called "gray market" or "parallel imports." Because these are genuine products, gray market goods are admissible provided they are not materially different from the products offered for sale in the U.S. As a result, parallel importers must be careful to recognize the differences between their imports and the products authorized for sale in the U.S. Differences such as foreign language labeling, packaging, and formulation may provide a sufficient basis for Customs to exclude the merchandise. Further, companies can seek so-called "Lever Brother Protection" from parallel imports. When granted, Lever Brother Protection requires that parallel imports be labeled as such prior to release.

Recordation

Customs and Border Protection focuses its enforcement efforts on trademarks, copyrights, and trade dress recorded via its electronic system. Recordation is a relatively simple and inexpensive step that provides significant benefits. Recordation publishes the claim for protection to Customs personnel throughout the country and alerts them to the possibility that infringing merchandise is being presented for entry. Recordation should be part of a rights holder's larger strategy of working with Customs to protect its investment in intellectual property.

Section 337

Determining whether a product infringes upon a U.S. patent is often requires the application of complex legal and technical knowledge. Because of the complexity of the issues, the enforcement of patent rights at the border is entrusted to the U.S. International Trade Commission, which has staff attorneys and Administrative Law Judges dedicated to reviewing claims made before the agency. If infringement is found, the ITC can order that the merchandise be excluded from the United States. It falls to Customs and Border Protection to enforce those orders.

Our Role

Barnes/Richardson lawyers have assisted clients with all aspects of the border enforcement of intellectual property law including:

                    Recording trademarks
                    Recording copyrights
                    Developing brand protection materials for training Customs personnel
                    Responding to CBP seizure notices
                    Seeking rulings from CBP to confirm compliance with 337 exclusion orders

Should you have questions or concerns regarding the importation or exclusion of merchandise subject to intellectual property protection, please contact a Barnes/Richardson lawyer.
Sep. 16, 2025
Steel and Aluminum Derivatives Open for *More* Additions (Somehow)
Sep. 16, 2025
USTR Opens Comments for 2026 USMCA Review
Sep. 16, 2025
Commerce Issues Interim Auto Parts 232 Inclusion Process Information
Sep. 15, 2025
Implementing Some Tariff-Related Elements of the U.S.-Japan Agreement
Sep. 12, 2025
U.S. Tariff Focus in the Limelight of Mounting Russia Sanctions Debate
Sep. 8, 2025
Another Friday Surprise: Reciprocal Tariff Coverage Modified
Sep. 5, 2025
U.S. Seeks Expedited Writ of Certiorari from SCOTUS on IEEPA Tariffs Case
Sep. 5, 2025
500% Tariffs & Other Sanctions Looming on Russia And Its Trading Partners
Sep. 5, 2025
U.S.–Japan Trade Deal Clarified to 15% Inclusive, Retroactive Tariff
Sep. 5, 2025
Mexico Considering Increasing Non-FTA Tariffs
Sep. 2, 2025
BIS Ending Validated End User (VEU) Program
Aug. 29, 2025
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Rules Against IEEPA Tariffs
Aug. 21, 2025
US and EU confirm Trade Framework in Joint Statement
Aug. 19, 2025
High-Priority Sectors Added to UFLPA Enforcement
Aug. 18, 2025
CBP Touts (Some) Dumping Evasion Wins
Aug. 15, 2025
New AD/CVD Petitions on High Purity Dissolving Pulp from Brazil and Norway
Aug. 15, 2025
Commerce Adds 407 (!) HTS Codes to 232 Derivative Annexes Starting Monday
Aug. 14, 2025
U.S. Eyes Content Percentage for "Transshipment" Enforcement
Aug. 11, 2025
Trump Extends China Tariffs by 90 Days
Aug. 11, 2025
Creatively Ambiguous Japan Deal has Unstacked 15% Baseline
Aug. 8, 2025
Indications of Steel and Aluminum Quotas for EU in Trade Deal
Aug. 6, 2025
Additional 25% Tariffs on Indian Imports Announced
Aug. 1, 2025
New Round of Global Tariffs: A Round Up
Jul. 31, 2025
Copper 232 Coverage Issued Through Customs
Jul. 30, 2025
Gird Your Wires: Copper Tariffs Coming August 1st
Jul. 30, 2025
Brazil Gets Its Own IEEPA Tariffs
Jul. 30, 2025
De Minimis Window to Close August 29
Jul. 29, 2025
Boston Train Cars Detained by Customs for Forced Labor Allegations
Jul. 28, 2025
Trump Announces Trade Agreement Framework with the EU
Jul. 23, 2025
Trump Announces Trade Deals with Philippines, Indonesia, and Japan
Jul. 16, 2025
USTR Initiates Section 301 Investigation on Brazil
Jul. 15, 2025
Commerce Initiates Section 232 Investigations into Drones and Polysilicon Imports
Jul. 8, 2025
President Trump Spills the Tea on Copper Tariffs
Jul. 2, 2025
Trump Announces Trade Deal With Vietnam
Jul. 1, 2025
Canada Changes Course on Digital Services Tax
Jun. 17, 2025
Trump Administration and UK Sign Trade Deal
Jun. 16, 2025
Customs' Guidance on Aluminum Imports: Know the Country of Smelt and Cast or Pay 200%
Jun. 12, 2025
U.S. and China in a Trade Deal with Details to Follow
Jun. 9, 2025
Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Tariffs Rise, Change, and Maybe Expand
Jun.3, 2025
Section 232 Steel and Aluminum Tariffs on the Rise
Jun. 2, 2025
CIT Clarifies Scope Referral Requirement in EAPA Cases
May 30, 2025
Tariffs Back on For a While Probably, Maybe
May 22, 2025
Skirting the Law: UFLPA Compliance and Subsidiaries
May 15, 2025
Another Customs "Clarification" Excludes Feeder Ships from In-Transit Vessel Exemption
May 13, 2025
White House Announces Trade Deal With China (UPDATE)
May 12, 2025
Commerce Initiates Section 232 Investigation on Aircraft, Engines, and Parts
May 12, 2025
White House Announces Trade Deal With China