Intellectual Property
Customs and Border Protection is responsible for preventing merchandise that infringes U.S. copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights from entering the country. Customs is also responsible for the enforcement of exclusion ordered issued by the International Trade Commission in Section 337 cases, which generally focus on the enforcement of patent rights.
Recording trademarks
Recording copyrights
Developing brand protection materials for training Customs personnel
Responding to CBP seizure notices
Seeking rulings from CBP to confirm compliance with 337 exclusion orders
Should you have questions or concerns regarding the importation or exclusion of merchandise subject to intellectual property protection, please contact a Barnes/Richardson lawyer.
Trademark Issues
Importers of branded merchandise should be aware that the law prohibits the importation of merchandise bearing a U.S. trademark without the permission of the trademark owner. Thus, importers should be prepared to show authorization from the rights holder. Absent permission, Customs can seize the infringing goods. While Customs can seize any infringing goods, its primary focus is on the interdiction of counterfeit goods. Counterfeit goods are products that bear a mark that copies or simulates a registered trademark. Because counterfeiting is illegal activity, the counterfeited products are often of inferior quality and may pose a risk to health and safety.Copyrights
Customs also has the power to exclude "piratical" copies of products covered by copyright such as books, music, videos, software, and video games. A piratical copy is one that is produced without the authorization of the copyright holder. Because products imported into the U.S. often include a copyrightable elements (e.g., written instructions, packaging artwork, etc.), copyrights may be a viable alternative to trademark enforcement for companies seeking to prevent the entry of "knock-off products."Gray Market Goods
It is often possible to find desirable products on sale outside the United States at discounted prices. This creates the possibility that goods will be imported through unauthorized channels. Such goods are called "gray market" or "parallel imports." Because these are genuine products, gray market goods are admissible provided they are not materially different from the products offered for sale in the U.S. As a result, parallel importers must be careful to recognize the differences between their imports and the products authorized for sale in the U.S. Differences such as foreign language labeling, packaging, and formulation may provide a sufficient basis for Customs to exclude the merchandise. Further, companies can seek so-called "Lever Brother Protection" from parallel imports. When granted, Lever Brother Protection requires that parallel imports be labeled as such prior to release.Recordation
Customs and Border Protection focuses its enforcement efforts on trademarks, copyrights, and trade dress recorded via its electronic system. Recordation is a relatively simple and inexpensive step that provides significant benefits. Recordation publishes the claim for protection to Customs personnel throughout the country and alerts them to the possibility that infringing merchandise is being presented for entry. Recordation should be part of a rights holder's larger strategy of working with Customs to protect its investment in intellectual property.Section 337
Determining whether a product infringes upon a U.S. patent is often requires the application of complex legal and technical knowledge. Because of the complexity of the issues, the enforcement of patent rights at the border is entrusted to the U.S. International Trade Commission, which has staff attorneys and Administrative Law Judges dedicated to reviewing claims made before the agency. If infringement is found, the ITC can order that the merchandise be excluded from the United States. It falls to Customs and Border Protection to enforce those orders.Our Role
Barnes/Richardson lawyers have assisted clients with all aspects of the border enforcement of intellectual property law including:Recording trademarks
Recording copyrights
Developing brand protection materials for training Customs personnel
Responding to CBP seizure notices
Seeking rulings from CBP to confirm compliance with 337 exclusion orders
Should you have questions or concerns regarding the importation or exclusion of merchandise subject to intellectual property protection, please contact a Barnes/Richardson lawyer.
- Feb. 13, 2025
- Trump Announces Marching Order for "Reciprocal Tariffs"
- Feb. 11, 2025
- Important Changes to Steel and Aluminum Imports into the United States
- Feb. 11, 2025
- Details Regarding New Aluminum Tariffs
- Feb. 7, 2025
- Making Sense of the Trump Trade Agenda
- Feb. 6, 2025
- USTR Creates Supply Chain Uncertainty Related to Chinese-Origin Ships
- Feb. 4, 2025
- U.S. Trade Action Nets One Big Change
- Feb. 4, 2025
- China Announces Retaliatory Tariffs on U.S. Goods
- Feb. 3, 2025
- Trump Halts Mexico Tariffs
- Feb. 3, 2025
- Trump Apparently Halts Canada Tariffs
- Feb. 2, 2025
- Trump Implements Tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China
- Feb. 2, 2025
- Canada Announces Retaliatory Tariffs on U.S. Goods
- Jan. 27, 2025
- First (Potential) Example of IEEPA For Tariffs
- Jan. 27, 2025
- USTR Report Criticizes WTO Compliance by China
- Jan. 21, 2025
- Proposed Rule Prohibits Section 301 Goods from De Minimis Exemption
- Jan. 21, 2025
- Day 1 Trade Actions Have No Tariffs but Lots of (Potential) Impact
- Jan. 15, 2025
- East Coast/Gulf Workers and Ports Agree to 6-Year Contract
- Jan. 14, 2025
- Chinese Semiconductors Under 301 Investigation
- Jan. 13, 2025
- China Moves to Protect Its EV and Battery Supply Chains
- Jan. 13, 2025
- BIS Expanding Controls on Advanced AI and Computing Technology
- Jan. 13, 2025
- Customs Proposes Change to De Minimis Shipments
- Jan. 10, 2025
- CBP Seeks to Add Post-Departure Filing Requirements for Rail Shipments to Canada and Mexico
- Jan. 3, 2025
- BIS Assessing Controls of ICTS From China and Russia used for UAS/UAVs
- Dec. 20, 2024
- AD/CVD Petitions Filed on Erythritol
- Dec. 19, 2024
- AD/CVD Petitions Filed on Lithium-ion Battery Components
- Dec. 18, 2024
- U.S. Implements First Step in Trade Agreement with Taiwan
- Dec, 16, 2024
- Appeals Court Questions First Sale Decision
- Dec. 12, 2024
- Importer Pleads Guilty to Smuggling Chinese-Origin Tires into the U.S.
- Dec. 5, 2024
- China Retaliates Against U.S. Export Controls by Blocking Crucial Minerals
- Nov. 26, 2024
- President-Elect Threatens Tariffs on Canada, Mexico, China
- Nov. 22, 2024
- EU Forced Labor Regulation Advancing
- Nov. 22, 2024
- Significant Additions to UFLPA List
- Nov. 20, 2024
- History Offers Some Clues Regarding Export Controls Under the Next Administration
- Nov. 18, 2024
- Joint Action Targets "Third Party Enablers" Supporting Russia's Military Industrial Base
- Nov. 15, 2024
- Update on Recently Published BIS Cases – "Don't Let This Happen to You"
- Nov. 14, 2024
- U.S. and Indonesia to Expand Trade Relations with Critical Minerals Talks
- Nov. 11, 2024
- Pentagon Plans to Nearshore Supply Chains
- Oct. 31, 2024
- USITC Negative Final Determination On Aluminum Extrusion Imports
- Oct. 30, 2024
- EU Springs Forward with Countervailing Duties on Chinese EV Batteries
- Oct. 28, 2024
- Tangential Participant Liability Under the EAR
- Oct. 24, 2024
- Common & Commercial Interpretation Leads to 25% Section 301 Duty
- Oct. 22, 2024
- BIS Issues New Rule and Proposed Rule to Amend U.S. Space-Related Controls
- Oct. 16, 2024
- U.S. Legislators Call on USMCA Partners to Mirror UFLPA
- Oct. 15, 2024
- Nonprofit Report Links Pharmaceuticals to Forced Labor
- Oct. 11, 2024
- EU Follows Suit with Duties Against Chinese EVs
- Oct. 4, 2024
- BIS Imposes Penalty for Back-Dated Document
- Oct. 4, 2024
- Tri-Seal Enforcement Event Insights
- Sep. 27, 2024
- East Coast and Gulf Coast Port Strikes Impact Supply Chains
- Jan. 22, 2025
- Webinar: What We Know After the Inauguration
- Sep. 9, 2024
- McPherson to Co-Moderate Export Enforcement Discussion
- Jun. 2, 2023
- BRC and Attorneys Ranked in 2023 Chambers Guide
- April 01, 2014
- BRC Partner David Forgue Speaks at ITCC Workshop
- February 5, 2013
-
Detentions, Exclusions, and Customs Protests
By: Lawrence M. Friedman - May-June 2012
-
White House International Trade Initiatives
By: David G. Forgue
Copyright © Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, LLP. All Rights Reserved
Privacy | Terms
Website by FirmWise