Intellectual Property

Customs and Border Protection is responsible for preventing merchandise that infringes U.S. copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights from entering the country. Customs is also responsible for the enforcement of exclusion ordered issued by the International Trade Commission in Section 337 cases, which generally focus on the enforcement of patent rights.

Trademark Issues

Importers of branded merchandise should be aware that the law prohibits the importation of merchandise bearing a U.S. trademark without the permission of the trademark owner. Thus, importers should be prepared to show authorization from the rights holder. Absent permission, Customs can seize the infringing goods. While Customs can seize any infringing goods, its primary focus is on the interdiction of counterfeit goods. Counterfeit goods are products that bear a mark that copies or simulates a registered trademark. Because counterfeiting is illegal activity, the counterfeited products are often of inferior quality and may pose a risk to health and safety.

Copyrights

Customs also has the power to exclude "piratical" copies of products covered by copyright such as books, music, videos, software, and video games. A piratical copy is one that is produced without the authorization of the copyright holder. Because products imported into the U.S. often include a copyrightable elements (e.g., written instructions, packaging artwork, etc.), copyrights may be a viable alternative to trademark enforcement for companies seeking to prevent the entry of "knock-off products."

Gray Market Goods

It is often possible to find desirable products on sale outside the United States at discounted prices. This creates the possibility that goods will be imported through unauthorized channels. Such goods are called "gray market" or "parallel imports." Because these are genuine products, gray market goods are admissible provided they are not materially different from the products offered for sale in the U.S. As a result, parallel importers must be careful to recognize the differences between their imports and the products authorized for sale in the U.S. Differences such as foreign language labeling, packaging, and formulation may provide a sufficient basis for Customs to exclude the merchandise. Further, companies can seek so-called "Lever Brother Protection" from parallel imports. When granted, Lever Brother Protection requires that parallel imports be labeled as such prior to release.

Recordation

Customs and Border Protection focuses its enforcement efforts on trademarks, copyrights, and trade dress recorded via its electronic system. Recordation is a relatively simple and inexpensive step that provides significant benefits. Recordation publishes the claim for protection to Customs personnel throughout the country and alerts them to the possibility that infringing merchandise is being presented for entry. Recordation should be part of a rights holder's larger strategy of working with Customs to protect its investment in intellectual property.

Section 337

Determining whether a product infringes upon a U.S. patent is often requires the application of complex legal and technical knowledge. Because of the complexity of the issues, the enforcement of patent rights at the border is entrusted to the U.S. International Trade Commission, which has staff attorneys and Administrative Law Judges dedicated to reviewing claims made before the agency. If infringement is found, the ITC can order that the merchandise be excluded from the United States. It falls to Customs and Border Protection to enforce those orders.

Our Role

Barnes/Richardson lawyers have assisted clients with all aspects of the border enforcement of intellectual property law including:

                    Recording trademarks
                    Recording copyrights
                    Developing brand protection materials for training Customs personnel
                    Responding to CBP seizure notices
                    Seeking rulings from CBP to confirm compliance with 337 exclusion orders

Should you have questions or concerns regarding the importation or exclusion of merchandise subject to intellectual property protection, please contact a Barnes/Richardson lawyer.
Feb. 13, 2025
Trump Announces Marching Order for "Reciprocal Tariffs"
Feb. 11, 2025
Important Changes to Steel and Aluminum Imports into the United States
Feb. 11, 2025
Details Regarding New Aluminum Tariffs
Feb. 7, 2025
Making Sense of the Trump Trade Agenda
Feb. 6, 2025
USTR Creates Supply Chain Uncertainty Related to Chinese-Origin Ships
Feb. 4, 2025
U.S. Trade Action Nets One Big Change
Feb. 4, 2025
China Announces Retaliatory Tariffs on U.S. Goods
Feb. 3, 2025
Trump Halts Mexico Tariffs
Feb. 3, 2025
Trump Apparently Halts Canada Tariffs
Feb. 2, 2025
Trump Implements Tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China
Feb. 2, 2025
Canada Announces Retaliatory Tariffs on U.S. Goods
Jan. 27, 2025
First (Potential) Example of IEEPA For Tariffs
Jan. 27, 2025
USTR Report Criticizes WTO Compliance by China
Jan. 21, 2025
Proposed Rule Prohibits Section 301 Goods from De Minimis Exemption
Jan. 21, 2025
Day 1 Trade Actions Have No Tariffs but Lots of (Potential) Impact
Jan. 15, 2025
East Coast/Gulf Workers and Ports Agree to 6-Year Contract
Jan. 14, 2025
Chinese Semiconductors Under 301 Investigation
Jan. 13, 2025
China Moves to Protect Its EV and Battery Supply Chains
Jan. 13, 2025
BIS Expanding Controls on Advanced AI and Computing Technology
Jan. 13, 2025
Customs Proposes Change to De Minimis Shipments
Jan. 10, 2025
CBP Seeks to Add Post-Departure Filing Requirements for Rail Shipments to Canada and Mexico
Jan. 3, 2025
BIS Assessing Controls of ICTS From China and Russia used for UAS/UAVs
Dec. 20, 2024
AD/CVD Petitions Filed on Erythritol
Dec. 19, 2024
AD/CVD Petitions Filed on Lithium-ion Battery Components
Dec. 18, 2024
U.S. Implements First Step in Trade Agreement with Taiwan
Dec, 16, 2024
Appeals Court Questions First Sale Decision
Dec. 12, 2024
Importer Pleads Guilty to Smuggling Chinese-Origin Tires into the U.S.
Dec. 5, 2024
China Retaliates Against U.S. Export Controls by Blocking Crucial Minerals
Nov. 26, 2024
President-Elect Threatens Tariffs on Canada, Mexico, China
Nov. 22, 2024
EU Forced Labor Regulation Advancing
Nov. 22, 2024
Significant Additions to UFLPA List
Nov. 20, 2024
History Offers Some Clues Regarding Export Controls Under the Next Administration
Nov. 18, 2024
Joint Action Targets "Third Party Enablers" Supporting Russia's Military Industrial Base
Nov. 15, 2024
Update on Recently Published BIS Cases – "Don't Let This Happen to You"
Nov. 14, 2024
U.S. and Indonesia to Expand Trade Relations with Critical Minerals Talks
Nov. 11, 2024
Pentagon Plans to Nearshore Supply Chains
Oct. 31, 2024
USITC Negative Final Determination On Aluminum Extrusion Imports
Oct. 30, 2024
EU Springs Forward with Countervailing Duties on Chinese EV Batteries
Oct. 28, 2024
Tangential Participant Liability Under the EAR
Oct. 24, 2024
Common & Commercial Interpretation Leads to 25% Section 301 Duty
Oct. 22, 2024
BIS Issues New Rule and Proposed Rule to Amend U.S. Space-Related Controls
Oct. 16, 2024
U.S. Legislators Call on USMCA Partners to Mirror UFLPA
Oct. 15, 2024
Nonprofit Report Links Pharmaceuticals to Forced Labor
Oct. 11, 2024
EU Follows Suit with Duties Against Chinese EVs
Oct. 4, 2024
BIS Imposes Penalty for Back-Dated Document
Oct. 4, 2024
Tri-Seal Enforcement Event Insights
Sep. 27, 2024
East Coast and Gulf Coast Port Strikes Impact Supply Chains