Intellectual Property

Overview
News
Articles
Links

Customs and Border Protection is responsible for preventing merchandise that infringes U.S. copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights from entering the country. Customs is also responsible for the enforcement of exclusion ordered issued by the International Trade Commission in Section 337 cases, which generally focus on the enforcement of patent rights.

Trademark Issues

Importers of branded merchandise should be aware that the law prohibits the importation of merchandise bearing a U.S. trademark without the permission of the trademark owner. Thus, importers should be prepared to show authorization from the rights holder. Absent permission, Customs can seize the infringing goods. While Customs can seize any infringing goods, its primary focus is on the interdiction of counterfeit goods. Counterfeit goods are products that bear a mark that copies or simulates a registered trademark. Because counterfeiting is illegal activity, the counterfeited products are often of inferior quality and may pose a risk to health and safety.

Copyrights

Customs also has the power to exclude "piratical" copies of products covered by copyright such as books, music, videos, software, and video games. A piratical copy is one that is produced without the authorization of the copyright holder. Because products imported into the U.S. often include a copyrightable elements (e.g., written instructions, packaging artwork, etc.), copyrights may be a viable alternative to trademark enforcement for companies seeking to prevent the entry of "knock-off products."

Gray Market Goods

It is often possible to find desirable products on sale outside the United States at discounted prices. This creates the possibility that goods will be imported through unauthorized channels. Such goods are called "gray market" or "parallel imports." Because these are genuine products, gray market goods are admissible provided they are not materially different from the products offered for sale in the U.S. As a result, parallel importers must be careful to recognize the differences between their imports and the products authorized for sale in the U.S. Differences such as foreign language labeling, packaging, and formulation may provide a sufficient basis for Customs to exclude the merchandise. Further, companies can seek so-called "Lever Brother Protection" from parallel imports. When granted, Lever Brother Protection requires that parallel imports be labeled as such prior to release.

Recordation

Customs and Border Protection focuses its enforcement efforts on trademarks, copyrights, and trade dress recorded via its electronic system. Recordation is a relatively simple and inexpensive step that provides significant benefits. Recordation publishes the claim for protection to Customs personnel throughout the country and alerts them to the possibility that infringing merchandise is being presented for entry. Recordation should be part of a rights holder's larger strategy of working with Customs to protect its investment in intellectual property.

Section 337

Determining whether a product infringes upon a U.S. patent is often requires the application of complex legal and technical knowledge. Because of the complexity of the issues, the enforcement of patent rights at the border is entrusted to the U.S. International Trade Commission, which has staff attorneys and Administrative Law Judges dedicated to reviewing claims made before the agency. If infringement is found, the ITC can order that the merchandise be excluded from the United States. It falls to Customs and Border Protection to enforce those orders.

Our Role

Barnes/Richardson lawyers have assisted clients with all aspects of the border enforcement of intellectual property law including:

                  Recording trademarks
                  Recording copyrights
                  Developing brand protection materials for training Customs personnel
                  Responding to CBP seizure notices
                  Seeking rulings from CBP to confirm compliance with 337 exclusion orders

Should you have questions or concerns regarding the importation or exclusion of merchandise subject to intellectual property protection, please contact a Barnes/Richardson lawyer.

Jul. 23, 2024: Importers Required to Certify that Malaysian and Vietnamese Goods Don't Come From China
Jul. 23, 2024: OFAC's Extended Statue of Limitations
Jul. 22, 2024: Three Years in Prison for Export Violations for Hong Kong Man
Jul. 11, 2024: PVC, Aluminum, and Seafood New Target Sectors for Forced Labor
Jul. 10, 2024: Mexico and the US Have a Meeting of the Minds on Steel and Aluminum Transshipment
Jul. 9, 2024: Alleged Victim of Forced Labor in Chinese Prison Sues American Company for Damages
Jul. 8, 2024: BIS Publishes Report on Export Violations
Jul. 1, 2024: Supreme Court Overturns Chevron, Does it Impact Trade Cases?
Jun. 27, 2024: Crackdown on U.S. Outbound Investment to China
Jun. 24, 2024: AD & CVD Rates for Solar Cells of China Imposed on Imports From Vietnam
Jun. 24, 2024: $285K Export Control Penalty by BIS
Jun. 21, 2024: Illicit Houthi Shipment Sanctions
Jun. 18, 2024: The Nuclear Option: BIS's Power to Deny Export Privileges
Jun. 17, 2024: To Be or Not to Be, Is that the Question for USMCA?
Jun. 10, 2024: Importers Must Plan for Possible East Coast and Gulf Coast Strikes
Jun. 5, 2024: U.S. Company Settles Anti-Boycott Violation
Jun, 4, 2024: Indo-Pacific Framework Comments Due by June 21
May 30, 2024: USTR Requests Labor Review of Mexico's Largest Auto Assembly Plant
May 28, 2024: U.S. Companies Should Remain Vigilant for Anti-Boycott Provision
May 28, 2024: Most Section 301 Exclusions Expiring Mid-June
May 22, 2024: HTS Codes Published for Section 301 Tariff Increase
May 20, 2024: Commerce Makes Major Changes to (Some) Section 232 Exclusions
May 20, 2024: Senate Committee Takes Aim at Likely BMW and Jaguar Forced Labor Imports
May 17, 2024: DHS' Largest Ever One-Time UFLPA Entity List Expansion
May 14, 2024: Section 301 Tariffs to Remain, Increase in Some Industries
May 8, 2024: The Largest-Ever Civil Penalty for "Made in USA" Violation
May 3, 2024: Final Rule on EV Battery Tax Credit
May 3, 2024: New Bill Proposes Battery Supply Chain Tracing
Apr. 30, 2024: Understanding Exporter Liability for Re-Exports
Apr. 25, 2024: Mexico Imposes Very High Duties on Some Imports
Apr. 22, 2024: Climate and Trade Task Force Created
Apr. 12, 2024: Using French and British English to Classify Imports
Mar. 22, 2024: End -User Restrictions for OFAC SDN Listed Entities
Mar. 22, 2023: DHS Gets a Budget Boost for Combating Forced Labor
Feb. 13, 2024: Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity Implemented
Feb. 12, 2024: The 2018 Trade War Has Been an Employment Failure
Feb. 9, 2024: New Export Control Know-Your-Customer (KYC) Requirements for IaaS Providers
Feb. 2, 2024: Court Clarifies What Qualifies as a "Basket Provision"
Feb. 1, 2024: Fine Makes Clear That the FTC is Serious About Made in USA
Jan. 30, 2024: Sheffield Issues Guide for the Solar or EV Battery Sectors
Jan. 24, 2024: Importer Avoids 7% Surprise on Agency Arrangement
Jan. 19, 2024: BIS's Fast-Track to Resolving Voluntary Self-Disclosure
Jan. 16, 2024: Drug Cartel Linked to $10.4 million Customs Fraud Penalty
Jan. 8, 2024: Customs Publicizes UFLPA Detention Addendum
Dec. 19, 2023: US and EU Appear to Have Trade Truce Through March 2025
Dec. 19, 2023: House Select Committee Advocates Trade Changes with China
Dec. 14, 2023: A U.S.-Taiwan Free Trade Agreement is Very Unlikely

View Archive

Jun. 2, 2023: BRC and Attorneys Ranked in 2023 Chambers Guide
April 01, 2014: BRC Partner David Forgue Speaks at ITCC Workshop
February 5, 2013: Detentions, Exclusions, and Customs Protests
By: Lawrence M. Friedman
May-June 2012: White House International Trade Initiatives
By: David G. Forgue

U.S. Customs & Border Protection Seizure Information