ITAR

Overview
News
Articles

Defense-related articles and services are subject to special export controls contained in the Arms Export Control Act, and its implementing regulations, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). ITAR contains the United States Munitions List (USML), which defines defense articles and or services. While it contains many different types of items, from guns to nuclear weapons to toxicological agents, the USML is constantly evolving. If you are not sure that the article you are exporting qualifies as a defense article, you can submit a Commodity Jurisdiction Request (CJR) and DDTC will tell you.

All U.S. manufacturers, exporters, and brokers of defense articles, defense services, or related technical data, as defined on the USML, are required to register with U.S. Department of State, which has jurisdiction over defense exports. The sub-agency within the Department of State which deals with defense-related export is known as the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC). Registration does not confer any export rights or privileges but provides the Department of State with information and is a precondition for the issuance of any license or other approval for export.

One of the most significant issues for ITAR compliance is what is sometimes referred to as a “deemed export”, i.e., an export taking place by the transfer of defense information to a foreign national. Thus, merely showing or describing controlled technology to a foreign national is an export under the ITAR. The Department of State takes these “deemed exports” very seriously and there have been some high-profile prosecutions of academic personnel in recent years for sharing information with foreign students without proper authorization from DDTC.

There are several types of export authorization. The most typical is a DSP-5 (Department of State Publication No. 5), export license which authorizes the temporary or permanent export of defense articles and/or technical data to a foreign person (but not technical assistance or defense services). During the review process, DDTC will screen all parties to the proposed transaction against a watch list of known or suspected export violators, and a hit on this list will mean a full compliance review before any license will be issued. In about 30% of cases, DDTC will also refer applications to other agencies such as the Department of Defense for their comments and recommendations.

Because any license granted is conditional upon the purported end-user and end-use, DDTC will perform end-use checks on exports after they have been delivered to the foreign end user. Therefore, the responsibility of a U.S. exporter does not end at export; rather the exporter should be taking steps to ensure that the articles arrive at the licensed end-user rather than being diverted.

The Department of State has the option of asking the Department of Justice to prosecute criminally requesting fines and/or imprisonment or going for civil penalties of up to $500,000 per violation. As part of the enforcement process, DDTC may impose a mandatory compliance improvement program requiring the exporter to spend funds on compliance measures and may also require the party to submit to external audit. In serious cases, a party may be debarred from future exporting for a period of time.

Attorneys at Barnes, Richardson are experienced in dealing with ITAR issues. Whether you need counseling on dealing with a deemed export that may already have taken place, procuring a DSP-5 license, or creating a compliance program, our lawyers understand the complexity of the ITAR and can provide guidance to companies looking for help meeting their export regulatory requirements.

Jul. 23, 2024: Importers Required to Certify that Malaysian and Vietnamese Goods Don't Come From China
Jul. 23, 2024: OFAC's Extended Statue of Limitations
Jul. 22, 2024: Three Years in Prison for Export Violations for Hong Kong Man
Jul. 11, 2024: PVC, Aluminum, and Seafood New Target Sectors for Forced Labor
Jul. 10, 2024: Mexico and the US Have a Meeting of the Minds on Steel and Aluminum Transshipment
Jul. 9, 2024: Alleged Victim of Forced Labor in Chinese Prison Sues American Company for Damages
Jul. 8, 2024: BIS Publishes Report on Export Violations
Jul. 1, 2024: Supreme Court Overturns Chevron, Does it Impact Trade Cases?
Jun. 27, 2024: Crackdown on U.S. Outbound Investment to China
Jun. 24, 2024: AD & CVD Rates for Solar Cells of China Imposed on Imports From Vietnam
Jun. 24, 2024: $285K Export Control Penalty by BIS
Jun. 21, 2024: Illicit Houthi Shipment Sanctions
Jun. 18, 2024: The Nuclear Option: BIS's Power to Deny Export Privileges
Jun. 17, 2024: To Be or Not to Be, Is that the Question for USMCA?
Jun. 10, 2024: Importers Must Plan for Possible East Coast and Gulf Coast Strikes
Jun. 5, 2024: U.S. Company Settles Anti-Boycott Violation
Jun, 4, 2024: Indo-Pacific Framework Comments Due by June 21
May 30, 2024: USTR Requests Labor Review of Mexico's Largest Auto Assembly Plant
May 28, 2024: U.S. Companies Should Remain Vigilant for Anti-Boycott Provision
May 28, 2024: Most Section 301 Exclusions Expiring Mid-June
May 22, 2024: HTS Codes Published for Section 301 Tariff Increase
May 20, 2024: Senate Committee Takes Aim at Likely BMW and Jaguar Forced Labor Imports
May 17, 2024: DHS' Largest Ever One-Time UFLPA Entity List Expansion
May 14, 2024: Section 301 Tariffs to Remain, Increase in Some Industries
May 8, 2024: The Largest-Ever Civil Penalty for "Made in USA" Violation
May 3, 2024: Final Rule on EV Battery Tax Credit
Apr. 30, 2024: Understanding Exporter Liability for Re-Exports
Apr. 25, 2024: Mexico Imposes Very High Duties on Some Imports
Apr. 22, 2024: Climate and Trade Task Force Created
Apr. 16, 2024: Russian Aluminum, Copper, and Nickel Prohibition
Apr. 12, 2024: Using French and British English to Classify Imports
Apr. 5, 2024: The United States Trade Representative Grinds the Gears of the Rapid Response Mechanism with Two New Requests for Mexico
Apr. 4, 2024: End-User and End-Use Restrictions 101
Mar. 22, 2024: End -User Restrictions for OFAC SDN Listed Entities
Mar. 22, 2023: DHS Gets a Budget Boost for Combating Forced Labor
Feb. 16, 2024: Volkswagen High-End Vehicles Detained under Forced Labor Law
Feb. 15, 2024: First Bond Guidance in 33 Years Issued
Feb. 13, 2024: Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity Implemented
Feb. 12, 2024: The 2018 Trade War Has Been an Employment Failure
Feb. 9, 2024: New Export Control Know-Your-Customer (KYC) Requirements for IaaS Providers
Feb. 1, 2024: Fine Makes Clear That the FTC is Serious About Made in USA
Jan. 30, 2024: Sheffield Issues Guide for the Solar or EV Battery Sectors
Jan. 26, 2024: Increased Controls of Exports Destined to Russia or Belarus
Jan. 24, 2024: Importer Avoids 7% Surprise on Agency Arrangement
Jan. 22, 2024: CIT Overturns AD/CVD Evasion Finding
Jan. 19, 2024: BIS's Fast-Track to Resolving Voluntary Self-Disclosure
Jan. 16, 2024: Drug Cartel Linked to $10.4 million Customs Fraud Penalty

View Archive

Jun. 2, 2023: BRC and Attorneys Ranked in 2023 Chambers Guide