ITAR
Defense-related articles and services are subject to special export controls contained in the Arms Export Control Act, and its implementing regulations, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). ITAR contains the United States Munitions List (USML), which defines defense articles and or services. While it contains many different types of items, from guns to nuclear weapons to toxicological agents, the USML is constantly evolving. If you are not sure that the article you are exporting qualifies as a defense article, you can submit a Commodity Jurisdiction Request (CJR) and DDTC will tell you.
All U.S. manufacturers, exporters, and brokers of defense articles, defense services, or related technical data, as defined on the USML, are required to register with U.S. Department of State, which has jurisdiction over defense exports. The sub-agency within the Department of State which deals with defense-related export is known as the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC). Registration does not confer any export rights or privileges but provides the Department of State with information and is a precondition for the issuance of any license or other approval for export.
One of the most significant issues for ITAR compliance is what is sometimes referred to as a “deemed export”, i.e., an export taking place by the transfer of defense information to a foreign national. Thus, merely showing or describing controlled technology to a foreign national is an export under the ITAR. The Department of State takes these “deemed exports” very seriously and there have been some high-profile prosecutions of academic personnel in recent years for sharing information with foreign students without proper authorization from DDTC.
There are several types of export authorization. The most typical is a DSP-5 (Department of State Publication No. 5), export license which authorizes the temporary or permanent export of defense articles and/or technical data to a foreign person (but not technical assistance or defense services). During the review process, DDTC will screen all parties to the proposed transaction against a watch list of known or suspected export violators, and a hit on this list will mean a full compliance review before any license will be issued. In about 30% of cases, DDTC will also refer applications to other agencies such as the Department of Defense for their comments and recommendations.
Because any license granted is conditional upon the purported end-user and end-use, DDTC will perform end-use checks on exports after they have been delivered to the foreign end user. Therefore, the responsibility of a U.S. exporter does not end at export; rather the exporter should be taking steps to ensure that the articles arrive at the licensed end-user rather than being diverted.
The Department of State has the option of asking the Department of Justice to prosecute criminally requesting fines and/or imprisonment or going for civil penalties of up to $500,000 per violation. As part of the enforcement process, DDTC may impose a mandatory compliance improvement program requiring the exporter to spend funds on compliance measures and may also require the party to submit to external audit. In serious cases, a party may be debarred from future exporting for a period of time.
Attorneys at Barnes, Richardson are experienced in dealing with ITAR issues. Whether you need counseling on dealing with a deemed export that may already have taken place, procuring a DSP-5 license, or creating a compliance program, our lawyers understand the complexity of the ITAR and can provide guidance to companies looking for help meeting their export regulatory requirements.
- May 22, 2025
- Skirting the Law: UFLPA Compliance and Subsidiaries
- May 15, 2025
- Another Customs "Clarification" Excludes Feeder Ships from In-Transit Vessel Exemption
- May 13, 2025
- White House Announces Trade Deal With China (UPDATE)
- May 12, 2025
- Commerce Initiates Section 232 Investigation on Aircraft, Engines, and Parts
- May 12, 2025
- White House Announces Trade Deal With China
- May 12, 2025
- Customs Clarifies "U.S. Content" for Reciprocal Duties
- Ma 8, 2025
- U.S. and U.K. Strike Trade Deal Following Trump Tariffs
- May 7, 2025
- CIT Issues Classification Neither Party Advocated
- May 1, 2025
- A Brief Survey of the IEEPA Legal Challenges
- Apr. 30, 2025
- CBP Clarifies: In-Transit Tariff Exemption Applies Only to Vessel Shipments
- Apr. 29, 2025
- Administration to Ease Auto and Parts Tariffs
- Apr. 29, 2025
- Latest Executive Order Limits Tariff Stacking
- Apr. 24, 2025
- De Minimis Ending for Goods of China (and Hong Kong)
- Apr. 23, 2025
- Section 232 Takes on Medium and Heavy-Duty Trucks
- Apr. 17, 2025
- Another Rapid Response Mechanism Request on the Books
- Apr. 16, 2025
- Trump Orders National Security Investigation for Critical Minerals
- Apr. 10, 2025
- EU to Pause Countermeasure Response for 90 Days
- Apr. 9, 2025
- EU and China Strike Back with Tariffs on U.S. Imports
- Apr. 9, 2025
- Trump Announces 90-Day Pause on Country-Specific Reciprocal Tariffs
- Apr. 8, 2025
- Customs Issues "Reciprocal Tariffs" Guidance
- Apr. 8, 2025
- White House Indicates China Will Face (at least) 104% Duties
- Apr. 4, 2025
- Tariff Subheading Guidance for ‘Reciprocal Tariffs' Published
- Apr. 4, 2025
- Global Response to U.S. ‘Reciprocal Tariffs'
- Apr. 3, 2025
- Correction and Exclusions for ‘Reciprocal Tariffs' Published
- Apr. 2, 2025
- Trump Announces 25% Tariff on Passenger Vehicles, Light Trucks, and Auto Parts
- Apr. 2, 2025
- Changes to De Minimis Duty Free Treatment for Good from China and Hong Kong
- Apr. 2, 2025
- Reciprocal Tariffs Announced
- Mar. 27, 2025
- President Trump Announces 25% on Autos and Light Trucks
- Mar. 25, 2025
- 25% Tariffs on Countries that Import Venezuela Oil
- Mar. 19, 2025
- AD/CVD Petitions Filed for Corrugated Boxes from China and Vietnam
- Mar. 13, 2025
- Countries Around the World Strike Back at the Trump Administrations Increase in Tariffs
- Mar. 11, 2025
- U.S. Seeking Broad Trade Agreement with India
- Mar. 11, 2025
- As Tariffs Loom, Steel and Aluminum Rules Remain in Flux with Lost Exclusions and Increased Duties
- Mar. 11, 2025
- CBP Guidance on Duties on Imports of Steel and Steel Derivative Products
- Mar. 11, 2025
- CBP Guidance on Duties on Imports of Aluminum and Aluminum Derivative Products
- Mar. 11, 2025
- Canadian 50% Steel & Aluminum Tariff Reportedly Averted
- Mar. 11, 2025
- Steel & Aluminum Derivatives Tariffs Outside Chapters 73 & 76 Effective This Week
- Mar. 10, 2025
- USTR Announces 2025 Trade Agenda
- Mar. 6, 2025
- Tariff Exemptions on Mexican USMCA Imports Reported
- Mar. 6, 2025
- All USMCA Imports Reportedly Exempt from Tariffs
- Mar. 6, 2025
- USMCA Tariff Exemption Executive Orders Published
- Mar. 5, 2025
- Senators Revise Plan to Tie Duties to Carbon Emissions
- Mar. 5, 2025
- Tariffs on Autos Under USMCA from Canada or Mexico Reportedly Suspended One Month
- Feb. 4, 2025
- Steel and Aluminum: The Gifts That Keep on Giving
- Mar. 3, 2025
- Timber, Lumber, and Derivatives Get Their Own National Security Investigation
- Mar. 3, 2025
- Canada and Mexico Duties Deadlines Arrive with No Indications of Delay
- Feb. 28, 2025
- Trump Indicates Likely March 4, 2025 Duty Increases
- Jan. 22, 2025
- Webinar: What We Know After the Inauguration
- Sep. 9, 2024
- McPherson to Co-Moderate Export Enforcement Discussion
- Jun. 2, 2023
- BRC and Attorneys Ranked in 2023 Chambers Guide
Copyright © Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, LLP. All Rights Reserved
Privacy | Terms
Website by FirmWise