ITAR
Defense-related articles and services are subject to special export controls contained in the Arms Export Control Act, and its implementing regulations, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). ITAR contains the United States Munitions List (USML), which defines defense articles and or services. While it contains many different types of items, from guns to nuclear weapons to toxicological agents, the USML is constantly evolving. If you are not sure that the article you are exporting qualifies as a defense article, you can submit a Commodity Jurisdiction Request (CJR) and DDTC will tell you.
All U.S. manufacturers, exporters, and brokers of defense articles, defense services, or related technical data, as defined on the USML, are required to register with U.S. Department of State, which has jurisdiction over defense exports. The sub-agency within the Department of State which deals with defense-related export is known as the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC). Registration does not confer any export rights or privileges but provides the Department of State with information and is a precondition for the issuance of any license or other approval for export.
One of the most significant issues for ITAR compliance is what is sometimes referred to as a “deemed export”, i.e., an export taking place by the transfer of defense information to a foreign national. Thus, merely showing or describing controlled technology to a foreign national is an export under the ITAR. The Department of State takes these “deemed exports” very seriously and there have been some high-profile prosecutions of academic personnel in recent years for sharing information with foreign students without proper authorization from DDTC.
There are several types of export authorization. The most typical is a DSP-5 (Department of State Publication No. 5), export license which authorizes the temporary or permanent export of defense articles and/or technical data to a foreign person (but not technical assistance or defense services). During the review process, DDTC will screen all parties to the proposed transaction against a watch list of known or suspected export violators, and a hit on this list will mean a full compliance review before any license will be issued. In about 30% of cases, DDTC will also refer applications to other agencies such as the Department of Defense for their comments and recommendations.
Because any license granted is conditional upon the purported end-user and end-use, DDTC will perform end-use checks on exports after they have been delivered to the foreign end user. Therefore, the responsibility of a U.S. exporter does not end at export; rather the exporter should be taking steps to ensure that the articles arrive at the licensed end-user rather than being diverted.
The Department of State has the option of asking the Department of Justice to prosecute criminally requesting fines and/or imprisonment or going for civil penalties of up to $500,000 per violation. As part of the enforcement process, DDTC may impose a mandatory compliance improvement program requiring the exporter to spend funds on compliance measures and may also require the party to submit to external audit. In serious cases, a party may be debarred from future exporting for a period of time.
Attorneys at Barnes, Richardson are experienced in dealing with ITAR issues. Whether you need counseling on dealing with a deemed export that may already have taken place, procuring a DSP-5 license, or creating a compliance program, our lawyers understand the complexity of the ITAR and can provide guidance to companies looking for help meeting their export regulatory requirements.
- Feb. 6, 2026
- Secondary Tariffs Threatened on Countries Selling Oil to Cuba
- Feb. 6, 2026
- U.S. Finalizes Terms on Trade Agreement with Argentina
- Feb. 3, 2026
- Answering Dumping Questionnaires Just Got Harder
- Feb. 2, 2026
- Apparent India/U.S. IEEPA Duty Deal Reached
- Feb. 1, 2026
- El Salvador and Guatemala Get IEEPA Deals
- Jan. 26, 2026
- BIS and Customs Funding Appropriations: Where We Are and What's It All Mean
- Jan. 26, 2026
- Trump Threatens to Increase Korean Tariffs to 25%
- Jan. 20, 2026
- Trump Threatens Europeans With More Tariffs Over Greenland
- Jan. 15, 2026
- Negotiations Chosen Over Tariffs for Critical Minerals, For Now
- Jan. 15, 2026
- New 25% Tariff Imposed on Certain Semiconductor Imports
- Jan. 15, 2026
- Taiwan Said to Have Trade Deal with United States
- Jan. 10, 2026
- CAFC Upholds Use of Domestic Sales for Transaction Value
- Jan. 5, 2026
- Upholstered Wooden Products, Kitchen Cabinets, and Vanities Tariff Hike Delayed
- Jan. 5, 2026
- CBP Mandates Electronic Refunds Effective February 6
- Dec. 23, 2025
- U.S. Imposes Phased-In Duties on Certain Nicaraguan Imports
- Dec. 23, 2025
- USTR Publishes Semiconductor Section 301 Results
- Dec. 22, 2025
- Big Fines for (alleged) Duty Evaders
- Dec. 17, 2025
- U.S. Eases Tariffs for Switzerland and Liechtenstein While Trade Deal is Negotiated
- Dec. 12, 2025
- USTR Greer Says More Trade Deals are Coming, While U.S. Considers USMCA Review in 2026
- Dec. 12, 2025
- CAFC Rules Planning Calendar Classification Already Decided
- Dec. 12, 2025
- Customs Proposes Revoking Handicap Article Status From Ramps
- Dec. 9, 2025
- OFAC Imposes Large Russia Penalties as 2025 Comes to a Close
- Dec. 5, 2025
- BIS Steel & Aluminum Derivative Decision Pushed to 2026
- Nov. 17, 2025
- Reciprocal Tariff Exemptions Expanded
- Nov. 14, 2025
- Switzerland Announces 15% Tariff Deal with the United States
- Nov. 11, 2025
- China Suspends & Delays Rare Earth Export Restrictions
- Nov. 5, 2025
- White House Caps China IEEPA Fentanyl and Reciprocal Tariffs at 10%
- Nov. 4, 2025
- U.S. and China Strike Trade Deal — Export Controls Front and Center
- Oct. 30, 2025
- U.S.-Korea Trade Deal Details Released
- Oct. 28, 2025
- Japan in Critical Minerals Agreement with U.S.
- Oct. 27, 2025
- Trump Terminates Talks on Trade with Canada
- Oct. 27, 2025
- USTR Confirms Trade Frameworks with Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam (so far)
- Oct. 21, 2025
- USTR Considers 301 Tariffs and Suspended CAFTA-DR Benefits for Nicaragua
- Oct. 17, 2025
- Trump Imposes Heavy Truck and Bus 232 Starting November 1
- Oct. 16, 2025
- Cassidy Pitches Carbon Tax as IEEPA Replacement
- Oct. 9, 2025
- Changes to Steel and Aluminum Duties are in the Wind
- Oct. 7, 2025
- Trump Announces New 25% Tariff on All Medium and Heavy-Duty Trucks
- Oct. 6, 2025
- BIS Expends Entity List with Entity 50 Percent Rule
- Sep. 30, 2025
- 232 Duties on Wood Products to be Implemented October 14
- Sep. 25, 2025
- U.S. Updates Tariff to Reflect EU Framework Agreement
- Sep. 25, 2025
- Up is Down and Bread is Pasta
- Sep. 25, 2025
- Commerce Launches 232 Investigations into Medical Supplies, Robotics, and Industrial Machinery
- Sep. 24, 2025
- CIT Vacates Forced Labor Determination as "Arbitrary and Capricious"
- Sep. 24, 2025
- CIT Affirms Classification of Fish Oil
- Sep. 24, 2025
- Withhold Release Order Issued for Giant Bicycles, Parts, and Accessories
- Sep. 22, 2025
- CBP Determines New Origin for Brake Hoses
- Sep. 16, 2025
- Steel and Aluminum Derivatives Open for *More* Additions (Somehow)
- Jan. 22, 2025
- Webinar: What We Know After the Inauguration
- Sep. 9, 2024
- McPherson to Co-Moderate Export Enforcement Discussion
- Jun. 2, 2023
- BRC and Attorneys Ranked in 2023 Chambers Guide
Copyright © Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, LLP. All Rights Reserved
Privacy | Terms
Website by FirmWise
