Practices 
 

Intellectual Property

PRINT
Customs and Border Protection is responsible for preventing the entry into the United States of merchandise that infringes U.S. copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights. Customs is also responsible for the enforcement of exclusion ordered issued by the International Trade Commission in Section 337 cases, which generally focus on the enforcement of patent rights.

Trademark Issues

Importers of branded merchandise should be aware that the law prohibits the importation of merchandise bearing a U.S. trademark without the permission of the trademark owner. Thus, importers should be prepared to show authorization from the rights holder. Absent permission, Customs can seize the infringing goods. While Customs can seize any infringing goods, its primary focus is on the interdiction of counterfeit goods. Counterfeit goods are products that bear a mark that copies or simulates a registered trademark. Because counterfeiting is illegal activity, the counterfeited products are often of inferior qulity and may pose a risk to health and safety.

Copyrights

Another area of Customs enforcement is the exclusion of "piratical" copies of products covered by copyright such as books, music, videos, software, and video games. A piratical copy is one that is produced without the authorization of the copyright holder. Because products imported into the U.S. often include a copyrightable elements (e.g., written instructions, packaging artwork, etc.), copyrights may be a viable alternative to trademark enforcement for companies seeking to prevent the entry of knock-off products.

Gray Market Goods

It is often possible to find desireable products offered for sale at discount prices outside the United States. This creates the possibility that goods will be imported through unauthorized channels. Such goods are often called "gray market" or "parallel imports." Because these are genuine products, gray market goods are admissible provided they are not materially different from the products offered for sale in the U.S. Because of this requirement, parallel importers must be careful to recognize the differences between their imports and the products authorized for sale in the U.S. Differences such as foregin language labeling, packaging, and formulation may provide a sufficient basis on which Customs can exclude the merchandise. Further, companies can seek so-called Lever Brother Protection from parallel imports. When granted, Lever Brother Protection requires that parallel imports be labeled as such prior to release.

Recordation

Customs and Border Protection focuses its enforcement efforts on trademarks, copyrights, and trade dress recorded with the agency via its electronic system. Recordation is a relatively simple and inexpensive step that provides significant benefits. Recordation effectively publishes the claim for protection to Customs personnel throughout the country and alerts them to the possibility that infringing merchandise is being presented for entry. It should be part of a rights holder's larger strategy of working with Customs to protect its investment in intellectual property.

Section 337

Determining whether a product infringes upon a U.S. patent is often requires the application of complex legal and technical knowledge.Because of the complexity of the issues, the enforcement of patent rights at the border is entrusted to the U.S. International Trade Commission, which has staff attorneys and Administrative Law Judges dedicated to reviewing claims made before the agency. If infringement is found, the ITC can order that the merchandise be excluded from the United States. It falls to Customs and Border Protection to enforce those orders.

Our Role

Barnes/Richardson lawyers have assisted clients with all aspects of the border enforcement of intellectual property law including:

                    Recording trademarks
                    Recording copyrights
                    Developing brand protection materials for training Customs personnel
                    Responding to CBP seizure notices
                    Participating in 337 cases at the ITC

Should you have questions or concerns regarding the importation or exclusion of merchandise subject to intellectual property protection, please contact a Barnes/Richardson lawyer.
October 2, 2018
USTR Releases Fact Sheets about USMC Trade Agreement
September 25
China Imposes Another Round of Retaliatory Tariffs
June 22, 2018
USTR Announces Tariffs on Retaliatory Section 301 Tariffs on Chinese Products
April 4, 2018
USTR Publishes Proposed List of Products Subject to Section 301 Tariffs
March 22, 2018
USTR Office Publishes Section 301 Report on Chinese IP, Data Transfer Policies and Practices
August 22, 2017
USTR Initiates Section 301 Investigation of Chinese IP Policy
March 6, 2015
USTR Releases Report on Notorious Markets
September 19, 2014
Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade’s Meeting on Internet Protectionism
March 10, 2014
White House Releases 2014 Trade Agenda
October 01, 2013
Government Shutdown Impacts International Trade Agencies
March 5, 2013
President Obama Emphasizes Multilateral Trade Talks in 2013 Trade Agenda
February 13, 2013
President Obama Announces Launch of Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Negotiations
December 6, 2012
House Passes the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012
June 27, 2012
Williamson Named ITC Chairman
April 24, 2012
CBP to Share Information with IPR Holders in Counterfeiting Investigations
March 6, 2012
CBP Announces FY 2012 Trade Enforcement Priorities
February 28, 2012
President Obama Signs Executive Order Establishing Interagency Trade Enforcement Center
February 23, 2012
House Ways and Means Committee to Hold Hearing on Trade Agenda
December 7, 2011
USTR Seeks Comments on Canada, Japan, and Mexico’s Intent to Join TPP Negotiations, Undertakes 10th Round of TPP Negotiations

Sign up for Daily Report

Just enter your Email below and sign up to get our Daily reports